share
POST

The Lowdown on Bioidentical Hormones

You’ve seen them touted on TV. But are they really good for you? The North American Menopause Society weighs in on this controversial form of hormone therapy.





With so much confusion surrounding the use of custom-compounded bioidentical hormone therapy for treatment of menopause-related symptoms such as hot flashes, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) stepped in with a warning about the potential harm from these products. On January 9, 2008, the FDA warned seven compounding pharmacies that their claims that their drugs can prevent or treat serious diseases, including Alzheimer’s disease, stroke, and various forms of cancer, are unsupported by medical evidence and therefore considered false. Since compounded drugs are not reviewed by the FDA, women are encouraged to use government-approved, tested drugs whenever possible.

The term “bioidentical hormone therapy” itself most accurately describes a medication containing estrogen, progesterone, or other hormones that are chemically exact duplicates of hormones produced by women, primarily in the ovaries. Many of these bioidentical hormones (eg, estradiol, progesterone) are commercially available in well-tested, FDA-approved, brand-name prescription drugs.

But concern arises when bioidentical hormones are “custom-compounded” (custom-mixed) from recipes prepared by a pharmacist for a specific patient.
•    These medications do not have FDA approval because individually mixed recipes have not been tested to prove that the active ingredients are absorbed appropriately or provide predictable levels in blood and tissue.
•    The recipe not only contains the active hormone (or hormones), but also other ingredients that either hold everything together (in the case of a rectal suppository, an under-the-tongue tablet, or an under-the-skin pellet) or provide a vehicle for applying the product onto the skin (such as a cream or gel) or into the body (such as a liquid or a nasal spray).
•    There is no scientific evidence about the effects of these compounded medications on the body—either good or bad.

Another fly in the bioidentical ointment is that the salivary and blood testing used by custom compounders to “assess” your hormone levels are meaningless for midlife women because our hormone levels vary from day to day and even from hour to hour.

Custom-compounded hormones may provide certain benefits, such as individualized doses and forms, and mixtures of products that are not available commercially. However, without appropriate testing and standardization of the product you’re putting into your body, there is no assurance that the preparation methods will not vary from one pharmacist to another and from one pharmacy to another. Nor is there assurance that patients will receive consistent amounts of medication. Expense is also an issue, as many custom-compounded preparations are viewed as experimental drugs and are not covered by insurance plans.
8 readers liked this story.
Mor_ad_602x100_fab_2
Comments
11.04.2009
jeff hogrefe
Wendy couldn't be more correct in her statements. Any MD that claims that BHRT therapy is not evidence based medicine just hasn't done the research. Let me do it for you. Please read Kent Holtorf's recent article on the safety and effectiveness of BHRT therapy. Please read the Fornier study out of France. The warning letters sent to the 7 pharmacies centered on their advertising claims, it had nothing to do with safety or effectiveness. I believe even Dr Utian has written a favorable article on the benefits of estriol. Hummm... Please get the facts, do some scientifically valid research, and write a meaningful article. Your female patients desire nothing less.
10.23.2009
Wendy Lawson
In the interest of transparency, readers should be aware of Dr. Utian's (and NAMS) ties to Wyeth , which supports NAMS with grants and manufactures the synthetic hormones that were used in the WHI study. This study was abruptly halted when the research showed the detrimental effect of conjugated hormones on women's health. It was Wyeth's petition to the FDA that led to the action against seven compounding pharmacies. (For more on Wyeth vs. compounding pharmacies, see: http://www.menopausetheblog.com/2008/02/15/the‐fda‐vs‐compounding‐pharmacies‐vs‐wyeth‐act‐ii/) I respect and encourage the debate over the safety and efficacy of all prescription drugs, including hormone therapy, but women should be aware of the agendas of all physicians who dispense advice. To read a pharmacist's explanation about compounding drugs (and a rebuttal), see my blogpost on Menopause The Blog: http://www.menopausetheblog.com/2009/08/18/are‐compounded‐hormone‐products‐safe‐a‐pharmacist‐responds/.
Mor_ad_300x150_fab_b
most liked
Loader_buff
Other topics you might appreciate