We Hear You! Letters from Our October 2011 Issue

Leave a comment here or send us your feedback by letter or e-mail-- we love hearing your thoughts!

MORE • Editors
more october 2011 naomi watts cover image

I now realize that my "cure" that I have, up until now, attributed solely to receiving Craniosacral Therapy may be just remission, alleviating major stressors, hormone adjustments or some combination of these or other things. But I still believe that the Craniosacral sessions I received were the cornerstone of sending this nasty condition packing and I wish more sufferers were aware of it and tried it.

Craniosacral Therapy is a non invasive, gentle, deeply relaxing, non additive (or a least not in a bad, life threatening way!) alternative to chemicals that I was introduced to by a massage therapist. The technique was discovered/developed by Dr. John Upledger (www.upledger.com) and there are therapists practicing this method all over the world.
While it is probably not covered by insurance, if it works, and it did for me in about six $70 sessions, it is so worth it!

I know everyone is different and nothing works the same way for everyone. But since there are so many people suffering, what is the harm in looking at one more possible (non drug, no side effects) solution?

Hope this can help someone!

I was delighted to read your editorial "Ending the Beauty Versus Brains Debate." This is a topic that has interested me for some time, and it came to light in the news recently when it was exposed that JC Penney has created a T-shirt for sale that reads "I'm too pretty to do homework so my brother has to do it for me," with resulting well deserved backlash: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/08/31/jc-penneys-girls-shirt_n_943349....
I live in the northwest, where taking an interest in clothing seems to be viewed as selfish and superficial. I am an athlete and outdoorswoman, so I appreciate the value of fleece, goretex, wool, and capilene, but I also view fashion as a creative outlet, and love the idea of "wearable art." People frequently make false first impressions of me because of how I dress, ranging from assuming I am a snob, to being surprised that I am an environmentalist. When they get to know me, they are shocked to find out I have gone 3 weeks without a shower, pooped in an ammo can on river trips, and traveled in places like remote Africa.

I'll never forget an incident in college where I was eating in a small country restaurant with about 20 rafting guide friends. They were all "granolas:" dressed in hippy clothes and Birkenstocks, unshaven, ungroomed. There I was in my matching purple jogging shorts and singlet. The waitress went around the table taking orders, and when she got to me she stopped and said emphatically "what are YOU doing with this crowd?!" Most of my best friends over the years have continued to be outdoor types who have little to no interest in clothing or fashion. They love me despite my passion for clothes, which they cannot understand, however I have frequently been self conscious over the years about being judged for how I am dressed, especially on social occasions where I am not well known.

Recently I found some interesting quotes regarding fashion and a blog that proclaimed "your body is your first home, you should never feel guilty about adorning it" (author unknown). I especially liked this quote:

"You don't have to signal a social conscience by looking like a frump. Lace knickers won't hasten the holocaust, you can ban the bomb in a feather boa just as well as without, and a mild interest in the length of hemlines doesn't necessarily disqualify you from reading Das Kapital and agreeing with every word. " ~Elizabeth Bibesco

I hope Americans will learn to emulate the Europeans when it comes to fashion: cultivating a sense of personal style, valuing quality over quantity, and appreciating the beauty of adornment. Meanwhile, I hope you continue to tackle this topic and prove by your very existence that beauty and brains can coexist! ~Nancy Enz Lill, Spokane, WA
--Diane Trader, Kalamazoo, MI

First Published September 26, 2011

Share Your Thoughts!


Kiyomi Irihara11.19.2011

THANK YOU for selecting a lovely woman of color as your Grand Prize Beauty Search Winner. She and all the other women exude beauty from within as well. My first More Magazine was purchased from the newstand as I was attracted to the cover picture of Ann Curry. She and I share similar backgrounds and it was great to read about her. What I (and many other of my friends) would like to see is an increased number of women of color on the COVER of your magazine as featured bios. There are a plethora of talented and accomplished women to choose from in the entertainment industry. Be Brave, Lesley, do it! You'll be amazed at the results.
A faithful reader,

Julie Watters10.26.2011

I just received my very first issue of More. I subscribed after hearing several friends speak favorably of the magazine and the fact it's geared towards women my age.
On page 142 of the October 2011 issue, in the article entitled "Death and the Maidens" the author states Rebekah Adams (one of the "Maidens") "studied communications in college and did stints in the air force and the Minnesota Air National Guard..."
As an Air Force daughter,wife and mom, it is important to point out one does not do "stints" in our nation's military. A person takes an oath to uphold our constitution and obey the orders of our President. That same military member, no matter how long or short the time served, is laying his/her life on the line in service for our freedoms. It is disappointing to me More chose to say someone did stints in the military. One does stints working in the service industry, retail, etc. Also, the words Air Force should be capitalized as were Minnesota Air National Guard.
All our service members, past, present and future, as well as our branches of service, rather or not you agree with with the mission, should have our utmost respect.
I thought long and hard about making this comment and have come to the conclusion, in light of our Nation's current situation, it's important my voice is heard.


As much as I usually enjoy reading the articles in MORE, to see the lovely clothes and accessories' descriptions followed by "price available upon request" does NOT make me want to inquire about their(obviously)ridiculously, unrealistic cost.
When did it become accepted practice to fill the pages of magazines with items that perhaps only 10% of the population(if that)could even aspire to purchase?
In today's economy, I think this behavior is beyond
irresponsible...unless your intent is to further depress your over-50 readers, thereby causing them to require even more of the medications produced by the drug makers who provide so many of the ads we must wade through in each issue.
It seems to me that you have lost sight of your target audience: real women OVER 40.
Lets get back to realistic prices, please.

Adele Ellis10.15.2011

I look forward to the diverse issues in each of your magazines. There is always a topic that seems to be a part of my life and appears at the right moment. One of the articles in the October 2011 issue was about the migraine addition link. I have suffered from migraines for many years and finally went to a neurologist last April after begging my PCP to let me go to a specialist. The neurologist did give me a prescription for a triptan drug to stop an attack but what he really gave me that has actually stopped my migraines was a vitamin regime. His office and partnership shares this "cocktail" of vitamins to purchase that for me was a godsend. I was suffering from migraines that lasted at least three days two or three times a month and since April I haven't had one yet (this is mid October.) I maybe "jinxing" myself saying this but having been 6 months migraine free I'm happy enough with that! I am in perimenopause as well and know that the vitamins may be part of the factor as well as my hormone changes but I was curious why this type of solution wasn't mentioned in the article. Is this only offered by few doctors? It's not a cure-all but something certainly worth investigating.

PB Lear10.09.2011

I generally am inspired by the article in MORE magazine, which is why I subscribe; however, I am very disappointed in your Healthy Eating article in the October 2011 issue. It was misleading and full of incongruous statements. For example, the very first paragraph states that the authors of a recent report indicate that “the authors question why doctors and other medical experts routinely counsel overweight people to get rid of extra pounds even though scientists, after decades of intense research, have yet to find a reliable prescription for weight loss”. The idea that medical experts counsel people to lose weight and the idea that scientists haven’t found a reliable method for losing weight have nothing to do with each other. Doctors know that people need to be at a healthy weight to maintain their health, and the solution is actually quite simple - - people need to take responsibility for themselves better by eating right and getting regular exercise.
Being overweight is very problematic, and yet the interview with a purported nutrition professor indicated that it is not nearly as bad as we might think. Wrong! Excess weight leads to a lack of energy, a lack of self-esteem, and a multitude of potential health problems that can be prevented at healthy weights. This is common sense. I have personally been 30 – 40 pounds overweight for at least 10 years, so I know how difficult it is to lose and keep weight off, especially given the temptations in our society and eating habits, but that’s no excuse to encourage people to stay unhealthy.
The article did nothing to encourage healthier eating and/or regular exercise. It didn’t make any constructive suggestions. In my opinion, that article does a disservice to your readers. It should have been better balanced in numerous ways.

AM 10.06.2011

I'm not the biggest fan of your magazine to be honest. I received a subscription as a birthday gift :/ BUT, the article written by Amanda Robb, telling us about her "plastic surgery" and her young daughter telling her it was "about time" was simply offensive. I wish Amanda would have spent her $25,000 on therapy instead of fixing her face. Seems to me she has much bigger problems then not be the prettiest woman around. Her poor daughter is doomed. Shame on you More.

Love your magazine - but what were you all thinking when choosing the photo accompanying the great bit on "Sexist Nostalgia"? Too graphic. I had to rip the photo out of the magazine in order to comfortably focus on the article. Yes, the photo represents the fact that she "thwarts a rapist by stabbing him with her stiletto." Yes, I look to your magazine for the “beauty and brains” features that Lesley Jane Seymour talks about in the Editor’s Letter. However, I’m not looking to your magazine for graphic representation of violence. There are plenty of other media outlets for that.


Enjoyed all the articles in your October issue but none more than 'Big Love". Touching and filled with kindness and compassion, made me weep tears of joy and hope.
Thank you so much for including this lovely story in your magazine. It's timely and very, very important!

Post new comment

Click to add a comment